From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 23734 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2021 03:41:24 -0000 Received: from tb-ob0.topicbox.com (64.147.108.117) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Jan 2021 03:41:24 -0000 Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (tb-mx0.nyi.icgroup.com [10.90.30.73]) by tb-ob0.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1629C39852 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:41:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bounce.mMb319f4f5aae92c0b9de48f76.r522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa@9fans.bounce.topicbox.com) Received: by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix, from userid 1132) id 1121EFA4930; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:41:19 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=9fans.net; h=from:to :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-help:list-id :list-post:list-subscribe:reply-to:list-unsubscribe; s=dkim-1; bh=vnqn1X6rb3UEFxaZv+jB0EW6dzyEuB9KjLTn7vNdkak=; b=JsNUW9h47oGM O/73fbU2mcYW4/ZM3hP1CQoPbdobIpoThLvIRI0UQBkFC82dtfyvVOiRB8o4+0Ko H0Sf9BkTMTORBMo7OoAaXstbGIhCwbQZYUAnTQbLDlMFap/STp23RGPvj7n13lZg Glgt8AVjhfR9psGZlUHfP0BnFw4ZtTE= From: "Joe S" To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Dual dialing/forking sessions to increase 9P throughput Message-Id: <16098180750.51d0c6.72632@composer.9fans.topicbox.com> References: <86tus46ujm.fsf@cmarib.ramside> In-Reply-To: <86tus46ujm.fsf@cmarib.ramside> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:41:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="16098180751.AcBf.72632" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: dd1c7926-4f07-11eb-857f-098c1e2d11b0 Archived-At: =?UTF-8?B?PGh0dHBzOi8vOWZhbnMudG9waWNib3guY29tL2dyb3Vwcy85?= =?UTF-8?B?ZmFucy9UZTY5YmIwZmNlMGYwZmZhZi1NYjMxOWY0ZjVhYWU5MmMwYjlkZTQ4?= =?UTF-8?B?Zjc2Pg==?= List-Help: List-Id: "9fans" <9fans.9fans.net> List-Post: List-Software: Topicbox v0 List-Subscribe: Precedence: list Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> List-Unsubscribe: , Topicbox-Delivery-ID: 2:9fans:437d30aa-c441-11e9-8a57-d036212d11b0:522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa:Mb319f4f5aae92c0b9de48f76:1:Fb4rHdM4lvzVgpApTbTgDcZjz0_nLFOYierxKrKZQ_E --16098180751.AcBf.72632 Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:41:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hiro: =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 The purpose of doing this was not to just access multipl= e parts of the file. I was working off the quote below.=C2=A0 Maybe a file = server thats purpose is to mux parts of another file sounded like fun. My t= houghts are that you could then transer thoes chunks on a single destinatio= n on seperate connections. eg. =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 % mux -C 3 -F large.file =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 % tree. =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80 large.file =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80 large.file.mux =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80 1 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =E2=94=9C=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80 2 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =E2=94=94=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80 3 1 directory, 4 files Like I said though still learning though. On Wednesday, 30 December 2020, at 12:20 AM, cigar562hfsp952fans wrote: > There is, however, a very simple reason why this approach won't really work: the fids for a file opened on one connection won't be recognized by the server on the other connection. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Te69bb0fce0f0ffaf-Mb319f= 4f5aae92c0b9de48f76 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription --16098180751.AcBf.72632 Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 22:41:15 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
hiro:
    The p= urpose of doing this was not to just access multiple parts of the file. I w= as working off the quote below.  Maybe a file server thats purpose is = to mux parts of another file sounded like fun. My thoughts are that you cou= ld then transer thoes chunks on a single destination on seperate connection= s.

eg.
    = % mux -C 3 -F large.file
    % tree.
          ├&#x= 2500;─ large.file
     &nbs= p;    └── large.file.mux
              ├─&#x= 2500; 1
              &#= x251C;── 2
         =     └── 3

= 1 directory, 4 files

Like I said though st= ill learning though.

On Wednesday, 30 Dece= mber 2020, at 12:20 AM, cigar562hfsp952fans wrote:
There is, however, a very simple reason why this approach won&= #39;t really work: the fids for a file opened on one connection won't be recognized by the server on the other connection.

<= div id=3D"topicbox-footer" style=3D"margin:10px 0 0;border-top:1px solid #d= dd;border-color:rgba(0,0,0,.15);padding:7px 0;"> 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery o= ptions Permalink = --16098180751.AcBf.72632--