From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 30917 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2021 07:17:48 -0000 Received: from tb-ob20.topicbox.com (173.228.157.66) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 23 Feb 2021 07:17:48 -0000 Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (tb-mx0.nyi.icgroup.com [10.90.30.73]) by tb-ob20.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD2B373C8 for ; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:17:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bounce.mM62b7ac10b0006c58d077c900.r522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa@9fans.bounce.topicbox.com) Received: by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix, from userid 1132) id C71E81876EF9; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:17:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=9fans.net; h=from:to :message-id:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:list-help:list-id:list-post :list-subscribe:reply-to:subject:list-unsubscribe; s=dkim-1; bh= HHBVTD1V9P4CfMFshhm+YGeHTdCOM/wf947+/FV3RzQ=; b=A0UuNWwUcTmxV2Y/ YCgeYdVA3tpHaks/a5ViaP1eNtp8qtrQeJ5eTnW81QYj4BtGCVJaPDlCmwJF44iH h0Tf0dnuNt2Z6QWC40eAe4RE4JCRxYQeygcsiVb122USVONuV7gyOBf7Ush7hs+6 HCAAqWxz7JZuJvqNZn4TDT0+iuk= From: rt9f.3141@gmail.com To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Message-Id: <16140646610.c6B80.99174@composer.9fans.topicbox.com> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:17:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="16140646611.3dce93.99174" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3790f858-75a7-11eb-9393-910a9234e1fa Archived-At: =?UTF-8?B?PGh0dHBzOi8vOWZhbnMudG9waWNib3guY29tL2dyb3Vwcy85?= =?UTF-8?B?ZmFucy9UZjM0NDc1ZjFiYjY5Njc0YS1NNjJiN2FjMTBiMDAwNmM1OGQwNzdj?= =?UTF-8?B?OTAwPg==?= List-Help: List-Id: "9fans" <9fans.9fans.net> List-Post: List-Software: Topicbox v0 List-Subscribe: Precedence: list Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: [9fans] 2c/2l make sense, but why 1c/1l? List-Unsubscribe: , Topicbox-Delivery-ID: 2:9fans:437d30aa-c441-11e9-8a57-d036212d11b0:522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa:M62b7ac10b0006c58d077c900:1:uUcTIK6S0fb9wWneI9xnf9rU0_zHv1c5WRPcy8yYhvE --16140646611.3dce93.99174 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:17:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I'm wondering about the history of the 68000 compiler/tools. =C2=A0Support = for the 68020 makes sense, it had an MMU, but 68000 did not. =C2=A0And it h= ad some design flaws that prevented it from working correctly with the exte= rnal MMU, the 68451. =C2=A0So why does/did Plan 9 have a 68000 compiler? = =C2=A0Did Plan 9 ever run on an MMU-less 68000? thx. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tf34475f1bb69674a-M62b7a= c10b0006c58d077c900 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription --16140646611.3dce93.99174 Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:17:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I'= m wondering about the history of the 68000 compiler/tools. Support fo= r the 68020 makes sense, it had an MMU, but 68000 did not. And it had= some design flaws that prevented it from working correctly with the extern= al MMU, the 68451. So why does/did Plan 9 have a 68000 compiler? &nbs= p;Did Plan 9 ever run on an MMU-less 68000?

thx. = --16140646611.3dce93.99174--