From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <167c6870df9431bdd96abe32cd6d2dd1@quintile.net>
From: "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:30:36 +0100
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <b77ecac2999af7b2ca41c307d893e7a1@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] (no subject)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f37041dc-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Give or take that all the executables fail, I have enough MINGW
> binutils from the NetBSD package to convince me that MINGW can be
> built and no doubt some debugging will soon take care of the stumbling
> blocks.
>
> It is true that debugging is going to be hard without symbol
> information (one more good reason to go the ELF route for my GCC
> model, in my opinion) and that I need a real implementation of the
> SEEK syscall before I start on the debugging, but these are
> surmountable obstacles.  I guess you need to keep holding thumbs.
>

Sorry, this went completely over my head. It sounds like you
have achieved somthing impressive but I'am afraid I don't understand.

-Steve