From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <16ff6b980804290551g29ae04afxb94a7ad4d42c6e9a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:51:26 +0200
From: "Mathieu Lonjaret" <lejatorn@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <680c2ed5b58b0229497b6d4157631c76@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080429121624.GC3705@secousse.ipgp.jussieu.fr>
	<680c2ed5b58b0229497b6d4157631c76@quanstro.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 on an IBM eserver 325
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9c269d5a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

pc=0x3

On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:16 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> > Heh, you got me there. It's just that I was too lazy to rewrite all the
>  > stuff by hand. I only compared what was on the screen to that previous
>  > message and when I saw the value were the same I pasted again the old
>  > message. But I had indeed noticed that line was absent.
>  > So yeah, with the old 9load that line is not there and it still panics.
>  >
>  > Mathieu.
>
>  have you verified that the PC=3 with the older 9load?  with an
>  actual program counter, finding the problem would be easier.
>
>  - erik
>
>
>



--
GPG key on subkeys.pgp.net:

KeyID: | Fingerprint:
683DE5F3 | 4324 5818 39AA 9545 95C6 09AF B0A4 DFEA 683D E5F3