From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from tb-ob1.topicbox.com (tb-ob1.topicbox.com [64.147.108.173]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B21A208FE for ; Mon, 13 May 2024 07:54:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (tb-mx0.nyi.icgroup.com [10.90.30.73]) by tb-ob1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0871F725 for ; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:54:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bounce.mM87ce4c9f9e82fb2fa4b938f2.r522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa@9fans.bounce.topicbox.com) Received: by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix, from userid 1132) id 5C4421881891; Mon, 13 May 2024 01:54:32 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=9fans.net; h=to:subject :message-id:references:in-reply-to:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-help:list-id :list-post:list-subscribe:reply-to:from:list-unsubscribe; s= dkim-1; t=1715579672; x=1715666072; bh=C//QG/Yn/XI/XEnwaPWgEexZg U9bi0/e6GuuAzzHcVE=; b=GW7kiKk3YSzkw1vjiH0XWpyvZM/ldw1jnOJ9wKYuC 4jo6fwgY5U0zJGuIhXL5TM3d+zYfGlKZnT0REBwJLVVqCrj6QO83mboRJQAvF/T3 WG+HxA9RxuZla11wocX07AplOpRer/7nphSchMzGFoABZcwFQUtiyn/TIBGk/pbk NI= To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] Balancing Progress and Accessibility in the Plan 9 Community. (Was: [9fans] Interoperating between 9legacy and 9front) Message-Id: <17155796670.Fce4A.115784@composer.9fans.topicbox.com> References: <7eb7bd48-c6c1-4649-8c7b-000df046fed1@posixcafe.org> <17155723490.63cF0a1BB.31755@composer.9fans.topicbox.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 01:54:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=17155796671.0e15FC.115784 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: 427dbe06-10ed-11ef-8006-20772b2d11b0 Archived-At: =?UTF-8?B?PGh0dHBzOi8vOWZhbnMudG9waWNib3guY29tL2dyb3Vwcy85?= =?UTF-8?B?ZmFucy9UY2YxMjhmYTk1NWI4YWFmYy1NODdjZTRjOWY5ZTgyZmIyZmE0Yjkz?= =?UTF-8?B?OGYyPg==?= List-Help: List-Id: "9fans" <9fans.9fans.net> List-Post: List-Software: Topicbox v0 List-Subscribe: Precedence: list Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> From: "ibrahim via 9fans" <9fans@9fans.net> List-Unsubscribe: , Topicbox-Delivery-ID: 2:9fans:437d30aa-c441-11e9-8a57-d036212d11b0:522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa:M87ce4c9f9e82fb2fa4b938f2:1:SQLgs2ox6O7j9KixGXrUDxN68UwnHfJyZzEyWYSy51o --17155796671.0e15FC.115784 Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 01:54:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday, 13 May 2024, at 7:33 AM, ron minnich wrote: > At no time in all this was there any evidence of incorrect behavior on th= e part of 9front. None. Zip. Zero. Zed. They have always been careful to fo= llow the rules.=C2=A0 >=20 > Further, when people in 9front wrote new code, they released it under MIT= , and Cinap among others was very kind in letting Harvey use it.=C2=A0=C2=A0 >=20 > So, Ibrahim,=C2=A0 I can not agree with your statement here.=C2=A0 > 0.2.4.4 - PRAISE FOR 9FRONT=E2=80=99S BOLD ACTION, RE: LICENSING >=20 > Any additions or changes (as recorded in git history) made by 9front are = provided under the terms of the MIT License, reproduced in the file /lib/le= gal/mit, unless otherwise indicated. >=20 > Read: /lib/legal/NOTICE. >=20 > 0.2.4.5 - Everyone loves the Plan 9 license (circa 2021) >=20 > In 2021, the Plan 9 Foundation (aka P9F=E2=80=94no relation) convinced No= kia to re-license all historical editions of the Plan9 source code under th= e MIT Public License. >=20 > As a consequence, all of 9front is now provided under the MIT License unl= ess otherwise indicated. >=20 > Re-read: /lib/legal/mit This is a citation of the current FQA and in older ones predating the relic= ensing by Nokia=C2=A0 the same paragraphs were present. If those statements= from the 9front documentation are correct than your MIT relicensing predat= es the moment where the owner of plan9 Nokia made such a decission. This pa= ragraph regarding the "bold action" of relicensing appeard before the owner= s of the code made it available under MIT license. Please correct me if I'm wrong. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/Tcf128fa955b8aafc-M87ce4= c9f9e82fb2fa4b938f2 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription --17155796671.0e15FC.115784 Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 01:54:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Monday, 13 May 2024, at 7:33 AM, ron minnic= h wrote:
At no time in all this was there any evide= nce of incorrect behavior on the part of 9front. None. Zip. Zero. Zed. They= have always been careful to follow the rules. 

=
Further, when people in 9front wrote new code, they released it = under MIT, and Cinap among others was very kind in letting Harvey use it.&n= bsp; 

So, Ibrahim,  I can not ag= ree with your statement here. 

0.2.4.4 - PRAISE FOR 9FRONT&rs= quo;S BOLD ACTION, RE: LICENSING

Any addit= ions or changes (as recorded in git history) made by 9front are provided un= der the terms of the MIT License, reproduced in the file /lib/legal/mit, un= less otherwise indicated.

Read: /lib/legal= /NOTICE.

0.2.4.5 - Everyone loves the Plan= 9 license (circa 2021)

In 2021, the Plan = 9 Foundation (aka P9F—no relation) convinced Nokia to re-license all = historical editions of the Plan9 source code under the MIT Public License.<= br />

As a consequence, all of 9front is now pro= vided under the MIT License unless otherwise indicated.
Re-read: /lib/legal/mit

This is a citation of the current FQA and in older ones predating = the relicensing by Nokia  the same paragraphs were present. If those s= tatements from the 9front documentation are correct than your MIT relicensi= ng predates the moment where the owner of plan9 Nokia made such a decission= . This paragraph regarding the "bold action" of relicensing appea= rd before the owners of the code made it available under MIT license.
=

Please correct me if I'm wrong.
=

= --17155796671.0e15FC.115784--