From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:29:11 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <17f52a7d1356cee3f1efb6a5919619ec@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <3e1162e61003221424j77534f93te1d7d56a9087964c@mail.gmail.com> References: <94E58E8C-697C-4FED-8CBE-A8B696B9F885@9srv.net> <64a2e263f0a11e464ee0ecea93bcfd4b@ladd.quanstro.net> <8ccc8ba41003221320u4958d5ex84eb3438260f37f3@mail.gmail.com> <44e316d676994d41d7b0811b31da8b08@brasstown.quanstro.net> <3e1162e61003221424j77534f93te1d7d56a9087964c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Creating new mail users; mail -c Topicbox-Message-UUID: ef529e50-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > > russ had a specific objection to "append" directories. i don't > > recall how the argument went. > > > > Is it because you can bind in new stuff to a directory if you need it? not really. it was related to the problems with /tmp directories in linux. consider a standard unix-style mailbox. if you make the file append-only, but world writable (not world-readable), anyone can append a message to your mailbox, but only you can rewrite it or read it. the thought is that it would be nice to have a similar capablity with a directory, where the permission to remove is seperated from the permission to create. - erik