9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Brian L. Stuart" <blstuart@bellsouth.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Are there disadvantages to walk?
Date: Mon,  1 Apr 2019 19:49:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1859706859.14691305.1554148175942@mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1859706859.14691305.1554148175942.ref@mail.yahoo.com>

On Mon, 4/1/19, Ethan Gardener <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I remember hearing of some disadvantage to
> walking directories, but can't remember what it was. 
> Could someone remind me, please?  Perhaps there was
> more than one, of course.  Perhaps a performance trick
> couldn't be employed?
 
The only complaint I've had about walk was the expectation
in the protocol that servers produce the list of Qids all
the way down.  That got in the way when experimenting
with a server that used a hash table of full path names
to speed the walk process.

BLS



       reply	other threads:[~2019-04-01 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1859706859.14691305.1554148175942.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2019-04-01 19:49 ` Brian L. Stuart [this message]
2019-04-02 14:46   ` Ethan Gardener
2019-04-01 10:27 Ethan Gardener
2019-04-01 16:26 ` hiro
2019-04-01 16:32   ` Ethan Gardener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1859706859.14691305.1554148175942@mail.yahoo.com \
    --to=blstuart@bellsouth.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).