9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sape Mullender <sape@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] 2nd International Workshop on Plan 9
Date: Thu,  9 Aug 2007 10:59:50 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <18795ca611d4f80d167d15ec61c8de1e@plan9.bell-labs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070809145402.GD6223@gluon>

That might well be the case.  There are projects underway to develop
Plan 9 as a platform for massively parallel computing and I expect
we'll have several talks on the subject at the workshop.

	Sape

> About that, I'm currently working in the computing grid field,
> notably the use of grids among the (Earth) science community. I'm
> personally convinced that the way to go would be to build on a sane
> distributed base, like Plan9 but it's not at all the situation at the
> moment. 
> 
> The biggest structures are based on Linux (clusters or PCs) augmented
> with some middleware (such as gLite, or globus). The whole thing seems
> quite bloated to me from the beginning and it's getting even more
> complicated as the middleware developpers are trying to fit the needs of
> the different scientific communities.
> 
> Now to my point: I'm slowly trying to hint ppl at Plan9 but it's not
> easy since:
> -I'm not "big" in the middle
> -I don't have (yet) such a strong experience in Plan9 (only played with
> it a bit and installed a standalone cpu server)
> -there is no (afaik) example yet of a plan9 grid where one can submit
> distributed jobs, to convince ppl. Although it seems to me plan9 would
> be the best platform for that and hence would require way less work to
> obtain some elegant solutions than on any other framwork.
> 
> So my question is: do you think that Workshop would be the right
> occasion to demonstrate Plan9 to the grid ppl or is it too soon to
> convince of its possible advantages as a computing grid platform? Is
> it worth trying to get some of these ppl to go there? 
> Or am I completely mistaken on what this workshop is about?
> 
> Any thoughts on this are welcome :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Mathieu.
> 
>  
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:15:28AM -0400, Sape Mullender wrote:
>> We have started preparations to host the Second very International Workshop
>> on Plan 9 at Bell Labs MH in December of this year, almost certainly
>> Monday December 3 and Tuesday December 4.
>> 
>> Preparations are still underway, but we hope to post the official
>> announcement soon.
>> 
>> 	Sape
>> 
> 
> -- 
> GPG key on subkeys.pgp.net:
> 
> KeyID:	| Fingerprint:
> 683DE5F3 | 4324 5818 39AA 9545 95C6 09AF B0A4 DFEA 683D E5F3
> --



  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-09 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-09 14:15 Sape Mullender
2007-08-09 14:54 ` Mathieu L.
2007-08-09 14:59   ` Sape Mullender [this message]
2007-08-10 16:36     ` ron minnich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=18795ca611d4f80d167d15ec61c8de1e@plan9.bell-labs.com \
    --to=sape@plan9.bell-labs.com \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).