From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:20:22 -0400
Message-ID: <18d1c45531cde368698eead48687c6c5@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60807310728o4cf78211ud5ad698d252f972b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2049e07e918215a675b00f15ee549436@quanstro.net>
	<3e1162e60807310728o4cf78211ud5ad698d252f972b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 on Blue Gene
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f87bac44-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Obviously depending on the C calls involved, some are re-entrant and some
> are not, and that makes a rather large difference too.  You don't want to
> call strtok from two different threads (unless you have thread local storage
> available, then it might be safe).

malloc?  it should be available everywhere.  while the heap is not thread-local,
if the pointer to it is on the stack, functions like strtok may be used.

- erik