From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Sun,  8 May 2005 15:51:21 +0300
From: Sergey Reva <rs_rlab@mail.ru>
Message-ID: <19419614421.20050508155121@mail.ru>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Sleep-complexity
In-Reply-To: <20050508140323.14c96b22.20h@r-36.net>
References: <20050508140323.14c96b22.20h@r-36.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4678e1a4-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Hello Fans,

> Is there any reason for the for()-loop?
Without 'for' you can't call:
sleep max-long-value

I wont also add question:

sysproc.c:
> long
> syssleep(ulong *arg)
> {
>       int n;
>       n = arg[0];
>

man 2 sleep
> int sleep(long millisecs)

Why 'n' not defined as long?

-- 
http://rs-rlab.narod.ru                            mailto:rs_rlab@mail.ru