From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 23:02:33 +0200 From: Carsten Kunze To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <1967432233.10867.1407877353497.JavaMail.ngmail@webmail13.arcor-online.net> In-Reply-To: <1f95827978656d471a47f85587496c5c@quintile.net> References: <1f95827978656d471a47f85587496c5c@quintile.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] Many bugs in eqn(1) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0e82bb36-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > It is a shame if there are bugs in eqn - tbl has one or two also > but the source is there and it is all fixable. You could submit a patch. I'm working on it. But not just eqn--on a DWB port in general (to current UNIX versions). So it may take some time but I'll work on a fix. Is there a plan9 repository so I'm able to work on the most current code version? > You mention the DWB eqn (neqn I assume) - the plan9 eqn is (i believe) > a direct descendent of that and the solaris one a cousin so by comparing > code the bug may become obvious... No, I ment eqn. neqn I will test next (Usually I'm more interested in typeset output). Comparing with solaris is a good plan. Cheers, Carsten