From: Dave Mason dmason@plg.uwaterloo.ca
Subject: rumours of plan 9 going commercial
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 1994 22:21:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19940209032138.fVJcFw8BG1yvBcwl0FRHFjFED_5s_PIv3UGrBHUeRr0@z> (raw)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 1994 19:38:02 -0500
From: Vijay Gill <vijay@gl.umbc.edu>
> However, I think Rob Pike has said that they are trying
> to get Plan 9 publicly released. I assume he means as
> free software along the lines of awk or sam. I believe
> this is the only way Plan 9 will ever have a chance to see
> the widespread use it deserves, and so I hope very much
> that this happens.
Oh god, I think the earth moved for me.
I like the Plan 9 design *A*LOT*. I have read most of the
documentation (about a year ago).
I am currently running Linux on my laptop, because I refuse to run an
operating system for which I don't have source. As far as I'm
concerned, I do not have source for Plan 9, because though the
University may have source, I refuse to look at source that may some
day taint me and any operating system code I may produce (c.f. the USL
v.s BSDI lawsuit). If the plan 9 source was covered by a copyright
like NJ/SML (also from AT&T), I would almost certainly switch (despite
my editor comments below).
I am drumming up support for plan 9 here, but when I say it
doesn't run emacs, people lose all interest and the weird thing
is that after about 2 weeks of running sam, I would hate to go
I use emacs for 3 reasons: customizability, availability on any
platform on which I would consider working, and a shell interface
(under which I run the Unix rc) that I can use *from*the*keyboard* (I
*hate* mice). I played with the Unix sam for a while, but wasn't too
impressed (the native plan 9 version is probably much nicer). acme
sounds interesting... if there was a Unix version (for the machines
where I can't change the OS) I'd be willing to give it a serious shot.
../Dave
next reply other threads:[~1994-02-09 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-02-09 3:21 Dave [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1994-02-09 1:10 Scott
1994-02-09 0:38 Vijay
1994-02-08 22:26 Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19940209032138.fVJcFw8BG1yvBcwl0FRHFjFED_5s_PIv3UGrBHUeRr0@z \
--to=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).