* 9fs on the internet
@ 1994-04-15 4:15 Scott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Scott @ 1994-04-15 4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
According to the statistics from Merit, there's at least some 9fs
traffic on the internet. For March:
name port packets bytes
9pfs 564 41350 4358750
If there's anyone who will admit to doing this, do they care
to discuss the results? Was performance reasonable, compared
to AFS, say? Any security worries?
-- Scott
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* 9fs on the internet
@ 1994-04-15 17:03 Bob
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bob @ 1994-04-15 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
In message <94Apr15.001532edt.3010@groucho.cse.psu.edu>, Scott Schwartz writes:
>According to the statistics from Merit, there's at least some 9fs
>traffic on the internet. For March:
>
>name port packets bytes
>9pfs 564 41350 4358750
>
>If there's anyone who will admit to doing this, do they care
>to discuss the results? Was performance reasonable, compared
>to AFS, say? Any security worries?
>
>-- Scott
It could be me.
I have a laptop (Compaq LTE/25e, 486, 200meg disk, 12meg mem) that I carried
with me from Sydney to Wisconsin (sabattical leave). I plug it into the
ethernet here every now and then and mount a file system back in Sydney.
I also took it to the last IETF meeting in Seattle and did the same thing.
I've made a new kernal with SLIP support on a machine in Sydney and copied it
across. Performance was acceptable but I can't compare it with other systems.
Bob.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1994-04-15 17:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1994-04-15 4:15 9fs on the internet Scott
1994-04-15 17:03 Bob
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).