From: Arnold Robbins arnold@cc.gatech.edu
Subject: The Second Coming of P9
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 1994 13:53:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19941109185357.QFQnjHQgLv1LFnoKNncRn9N3BHKkgxrDI1P282xODls@z> (raw)
> | Even the Bell Labs guys don't know. Last I heard (a week or two ago), work
> | was continuing, with lots of stuff being back-ported from Brazil to
> | Plan 9, but still no definite date. Sigh.
>
> Why do any back-porting? Why not just release Brazil?
Again, this is repeating what I was told, but Brazil is not even stable
yet. There are people at BTL who use Plan 9 for day to day work, so stuff
is being back ported since it's useful. Brazil is nowhere ready for
release, it's neither stable nor even documented...
Arnold
next reply other threads:[~1994-11-09 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-11-09 18:53 Arnold [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1994-11-09 18:07 Scott
1994-11-09 15:02 Arnold
1994-11-09 6:48 Amos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19941109185357.QFQnjHQgLv1LFnoKNncRn9N3BHKkgxrDI1P282xODls@z \
--to=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).