From: serge@euler.Berkeley.EDU serge@euler.Berkeley.EDU
Subject: keyboard accelerators
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 20:16:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19950426001648.YKnaQj_LmzEoQes6QL_lQR3nPhDlnPYcIg0o5p5MlH4@z> (raw)
(Gee, the fire seems to be dying down. Now, where did I put that
gasoline? Oh, yeah ... WHOSH! :-)
Some random thoughts:
+ Apple, which was mouse based from day one (TM) (R) (C) (:-),
has keyboard accelerators ...
+ so does Windows (although you could say that it's because they
were trying to introduce mice into predominantly keyboard
based environment; also, Windows95 appears to have [much?]
less keyboard accelerators); still ... (both they and Apple
must have done some user interface studies; mustn't they? :-)
+ you can't do mouse ahead the same way you can do typeahead,
e.g. the mouse (pointer) can be in an arbitrary position, so
the motions needed to get it to the ``menu button'' (which can
also be in an arbitrary position, and move as well) differ
each time, unlike the keyboard (e.g. Ctrl+Esc,p,Return to get
to the Program Manager in W ... er, but I digress :-)
+ anyone remember piewm (X based window manager with
circular instead of drop down menus)? it was trying
to address some of these problems, e.g. you could
memory train your hand much easier: just click, pull
the mouse to the east and release
+ we are still talking about predominantly keyboard based input
methods (until voice recognition becomes commonplace :-), so
most of the time you are typing, rather than clicking with the
mouse; even Pike (who had to quit his Help paper because he was
about to have to start using the keyboard :-)
next reply other threads:[~1995-04-26 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-26 0:16 serge [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-04-27 0:00 Castor
1995-04-26 22:52 Felix
1995-04-26 20:07 serge
1995-04-26 12:23 rob
1995-04-26 7:19 Heiko
1995-04-26 1:05 Scott
1995-04-24 20:24 David
1995-04-24 8:22 Nigel
1995-04-24 5:15 Felix
1995-04-24 4:22 Mike
1995-04-24 3:13 ozan
1995-04-23 23:30 Boyd
1995-04-21 22:20 forsyth
1995-04-21 16:45 Don
1995-04-11 9:54 Nigel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19950426001648.YKnaQj_LmzEoQes6QL_lQR3nPhDlnPYcIg0o5p5MlH4@z \
--to=serge@euler.berkeley.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).