From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 12:24:32 -0400 From: 9fans-outgoing-owner 9fans-outgoing-owner Subject: No subject Topicbox-Message-UUID: 10fe3518-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Message-ID: <19950801162432.icAY9iOvrJCs0co4d6vazybcq6CTCqymOqGx_ggmoKo@z> ***** UNDELIVERABLE MAIL sent to absinthe, being returned by monte!absinthe ***** mail: Error # 8 'Invalid recipient' encountered on system monte Received: from nick.chem.brown.edu by monte.chem.brown.edu via ESMTP (950221.405.SGI.8.6.10/911001.SGI) for id MAA00314; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 12:24:29 -0400 Received: from Brown.EDU by nick.chem.brown.edu via ESMTP (950221.405.SGI.8.6.10/911001.SGI) for id IAA00694; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 08:50:57 -0400 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by Brown.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.10) id IAA13932 for absinthe@monte.chem.Brown.EDU; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 08:52:38 -0400 Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.1.6]) by Brown.EDU (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id IAA13927 for ; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 08:52:36 -0400 Received: by psuvax1.cse.psu.edu id <34047>; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 08:30:55 -0400 Received: from crab.plan9.cs.su.oz.au ([129.78.96.3]) by psuvax1.cse.psu.edu with SMTP id <33958>; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 08:30:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Aug 1995 08:25:37 -0400 X-PH: V4.2@Brown.EDU From: dhog@plan9.cs.su.oz.au To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: The Old and the New Message-Id: <95Aug1.083035edt.33958@psuvax1.cse.psu.edu> Sender: owner-9fans@cse.psu.edu Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Here at Basser we have a mixture of machines running the old and new versions of Plan 9. We would like to get rid of the old version. However, one of these machines is a fileserver, with attached jukebox, containing valuable files. Is it safe to just install a new file server kernel on it? I am guessing that the disk filesystem format hasn't changed; is this a safe assumption to make? Note for those not in the know: the 9P protocol has changed in the second edition, due to changes in the way that Plan 9 does its authentication. Writing a "protocol convertor" looks infeasible, unless you only want to log in as user "none". Not all files on the old system are publically readable, and neither should they be. Currently we have one CPU server still on the old system, allowing us to use ftpfs to access the old files. But this is quite clumsy, hence my desire to just run the new system with the old files. So... Can it be done?