9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ture P}lsson ture@lysator.liu.se
Subject: [comp.os.linux.misc] Help wanted, Plan9 a piece of junk!
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 1995 09:28:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19950815132831.yur_xYges8_vc79eNDV66KSbZDvsaUR_F_4Bul7UhEM@z> (raw)

> >[...]
> >I want to recover my more than half-year work, since I don't have tape
> >backup.
> 
> HAHAHAHA!!  Stop it, you're killing me!

Seriously, I don't like the way the 4-disk set is supposed to
magically figure out what partition on my disk to install on. I have a
farily complicated partition setup, and I want to tell Plan 9 to "go
onto /dev/hda3, period!" (Or whatever Plan 9 calls the third partition
on the first disk).

However, I haven't managed to get as far as actually installing the
thing. During the fist stage, copying files to C:\PLAN9, it says
"problem copying file: file does not exist" about a file which most
certainly is on the floppy -- both DOS and Linux can read
it. (Naturally, I left my notes at home so I don't remember the exact
name of the file...) After rebooting into DOS, there's no trace of
Plan9 on C:, but when I reboot from the first Plan9 floppy it tells me
that Plan9 is already on my disk, and asks whether I want to
reconfigure.

I'm beginning to suspect that the installation program somehow gets
confused by my setup, and tries to copy the floppy onto itself, or
something similarly stupid. Is that possible?

I _am_ two megabytes showt of RAM (i.e, I have only 6 MB). Is 8 Mbytes
a "hard" limit, or is it just a "it-will-run-but-not-very-fast" limit?
(Even Solaris can run in 8 Mbytes, and I though Plan9 was supposed to
be small?)

My setup is: Noname asian-made 386+387sx, AMI BIOS, Trident 8900C, two
Seagate IDE disks (102 + 545 Mbytes, on the same controller), one 3.5"
(known by dos as A:) and one 5.25" floppy.






             reply	other threads:[~1995-08-15 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1995-08-15 13:28 Ture [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-08-25  6:28 dhog
1995-08-25  4:14 Johnson
1995-08-24  8:49 dhog
1995-08-24  7:27 Johnson
1995-08-23 15:13 Victor
1995-08-22 11:25 dhog
1995-08-22  6:18 Vadim
1995-08-21 22:54 forsyth
1995-08-21  4:59 Vadim
1995-08-19 13:32 forsyth
1995-08-19  5:03 pete
1995-08-16 21:16 Scott
1995-08-16 14:42 Steve_Kilbane
1995-08-16  6:39 dhog
1995-08-16  5:45 dhog
1995-08-16  1:12 forsyth
1995-08-15 16:00 Bill
1995-08-15 15:24 presotto
1995-08-15 14:53 Greg
1995-08-15 13:29 jmk
1995-08-15 12:38 David
1995-08-15 10:29 dhog
1995-08-14 21:46 Bill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19950815132831.yur_xYges8_vc79eNDV66KSbZDvsaUR_F_4Bul7UhEM@z \
    --to=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).