From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 1 Sep 1995 14:52:36 -0400 From: Mike McCarty jmccarty@spdmail.spd.dsccc.com Subject: Why? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1f51bf72-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Message-ID: <19950901185236.taaFpXgF8IqonE515gBOhE7s2rAlRqtmTkO4u6xvR-0@z> In article , David Kelley wrote: )>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Sill writes: )In article de5@sws5.ctd.ornl.GOV (Dave Sill) writes: ) )Dave> Plan 9 sounds interesting, but why would I want to install it )Dave> other than to satisfy my intellectual curiosity? ) )I've been thinking of installing it as well, and I agree that I don't think )it will serve any other purpose than that for me. It's a for-the-heck-of-it, )OS hobbyist kind of activity. ) )I'm using Win95 and Linux. But I'm short on diskspace (no wonder), )so I think I'll add a new drive and put Plan9 on the end of it for yucks. )I'll keep critical data on the old drive since I'm wary of Plan9's )presumptuous partitioning scheme. The reason for investigating Plan 9 (named for the movie "Plan 9 from Outer Space), is NONE OF THE ABOVE. Plan 9 is a "distributed" operating system. So it can manage multiple CPU's. That is the real reason. It can do things which Windows, DOS, MACOS, etc. never even thought of. Mike ---- char *p="char *p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} I don't speak for DSC.