From: Bill Hogan bhogan@bedlam.rahul.net
Subject: PC-clone hardware
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 07:25:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19950905112500.ltOAQ07nhAG6vXcOYsCm2ACSuDOjpAKEX1jD3b--2kc@z> (raw)
"BM" == Borja Marcos <borjam@we.lc.ehu.es> writes:
>>
>> In "What We Use - Last Updated 1-Aug-95", it says:
>> > Until recently we've used the AMI Enterprise IV:
>>
>> What have you been using recently?
>>
>> I'm thinking of getting a 486DX2-66, with 256K cache, but
>> I haven't been able to find any AMI motherboards around here yet.
>>
>> One store I visited told me "the brand of motherboard is usually
>> stated as the brand of CPU on it", which doesn't jive with
>> the above document since it lists an SiS chipset on the AMI board.
>>
>> What's more important to look for, the motherboard or cpu manufacturer?
>>
>> Intel and AMD seem to be popular in the local stores here,
>> which of those two would people recommend?
>>
>> The variety in PC hardware scares me - sorry if these are basic questions.
>>
BM> I think the CPU manufacturer is not important. As far as I know
BM> they are compatible. The problem arises, however, with the chipset.
BM> For example, I wouldn't recommend ALI chipsets. I have had real
BM> problems with this chipset. I think the OPTI chipset is a good one.
BM> Anyway, there are more important factors such as manufacturing
BM> quality. I have found that most of the motherboards currently sold
BM> are a piece of junk valid only for running MSDOS and Windows,
BM> incapable of running for a period of time without a reboot.
BM> The only answer is to test the motherboard you are going to use.
BM> Another problem is that most dealers change regularly their motherboards.
BM> Borja.
>>
I agree with this.
Also, on the theory that if a PC supports Linux it is a reasonably
good bet it will support plan9, I might suggest lurking in places like
comp.os.linux.hardware? (I can think of a couple of PC vendors who
sell what they claim to be Linux compatible systems but I have never
used one so I can't recommend any.)
Bill
next reply other threads:[~1995-09-05 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-09-05 11:25 Bill [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-09-06 16:37 Borja
1995-09-06 14:02 Steve
1995-09-06 9:40 Borja
1995-09-06 0:04 jmk
1995-09-05 16:52 Geoff
1995-09-05 7:35 Borja
1995-09-05 4:14 Steve
1995-07-28 20:43 Steve
1995-07-28 18:06 Steve
1995-04-10 3:03 jmk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19950905112500.ltOAQ07nhAG6vXcOYsCm2ACSuDOjpAKEX1jD3b--2kc@z \
--to=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).