From: Staffan Ulfberg staffanu@tcs07.nada.kth.se
Subject: fixes in the works
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 03:48:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19950906074800.JBkEMfO762u-lphnCbYkd1GLfXOGTIIWMsf8MV9dOjE@z> (raw)
In article <67661.sharris@fox.nstn.ca> sharris@fox.nstn.CA (sharris) writes:
jmk@plan9.ATt.COM <jmk@plan9.ATt.COM> wrote:
> > From: staffanu@tcs07.nada.kth.SE (Staffan Ulfberg)
> > Subject: Re: Installation problems:-(
> > ...
> > When b.com is started, it prints info about the hard drives it can
> > find on the screen; in my case:
> >
> > >hd0: 1669260 sectors 854661120 bytes
> > >hd1: 128 sectors 280559616 bytes (This is wrong! The drive is 560MB.)
> > (Exactly half of "real capacity"?)
DOS or the BIOS has a limitation where it can't handle anything > 1023
cylinders, so there's often something in the boot sector fiddles the
numbers. e.g. with a 1200 cylinder 8 head drive, the BIOS pretends
it's 600 and 16 to get around that limitation. Linux on large drives
needs to have this nonsense overridden or it gets very confused.
Sounds to me like Plan 9 & the DOS number-fiddling software don't
like each other & Plan 9 is only seeing half the cylinders.
I also thought it might have to do with this, but not anymore... I
have deleted all partitions on the second drive, fiddled with the CMOS
setup options,... nothing helps. (Also, I don't have a DOS driver to
use the >1024 cylinders - I use OS/2 :-) Also, I have succesfully
installed Plan 9 on my first drive now, which is 850 MB. I just think
my drive is incompatible. Anyone else using a Samsung 560 MB?
Staffan
P.S. I found some very informative documents describing how
partitoining, booting, 1024 cylinder boundaries, etc. work on a PC:
ftp://ftp.rahul.net/pub/lps/hard-disk/How_It_Works...
--
/D{def}def /d{.00017 add D}D /C{2 copy dup mul exch dup mul}D /g 150 string
D /y .29 D 150 150 8[.4 0 0 .4 -45 -90]{/x -1.2 D 0 1 149{x y /n 300 D{/n n
5 sub D C exch sub x add 3 1 roll 2 mul mul y add C add 4 gt n 5 eq or{exit
}if}loop pop pop g exch n put /x x d}for /y y d g}image showpage
next reply other threads:[~1995-09-06 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-09-06 7:48 Staffan [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-09-04 11:33 sharris
1995-09-02 14:14 jmk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19950906074800.JBkEMfO762u-lphnCbYkd1GLfXOGTIIWMsf8MV9dOjE@z \
--to=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).