9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Borman prb@bsdi.com
Subject: Why?
Date: Wed,  6 Sep 1995 15:52:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19950906195231.Q-VxuoCSCqItrJ4qA6Mj3OSWKYBCUL7lw_1ZffFin8U@z> (raw)

It costs a few bucks to make a CD.  It costs a lot of money to be a
corporation, have employees, pay lawyers, etc.  It is *totally*
unfare to compare Linux (or FreeBSD, or ...) to anything that is
done by a corporation.  They are totally different entities.
I am just happy that AT&T even allowed Plan 9 out the door and
made it for such a reasonable cost (I to would have liked it to
be cheaper, but I certainly can't complain about a $350 site
license).

			    -Paul Borman
			     prb@bsdi.com

> My benchmark is Linux. There are 4-CD Linux distributions that sell
> for $25. Surely Plan 9 source, docs & binaries would fit on a couple
> CD's--forget the printed manuals.
> 
> > Regardless, I don't see what the big problem with $350 is. There
> > are a lot of other areas of interest where you would have to justify
> > sums either similar or an order of magnitude larger, that to many
> > will seem unjustifiable.
> 
> I just think Plan 9 would have a bigger impact, and sooner, if it was
> less expensive. Yes, I *could* find $350...if I wanted it that
> badly. Think how many more people would buy it, try it, and hack on it
> if it was $50...
>  
> -- 
> Dave Sill (de5@ornl.gov)          <URL:http://www.digital.com/info/dsill.html>
> Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Oak Ridge National Lab, Workstation Support
> 






             reply	other threads:[~1995-09-06 19:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1995-09-06 19:52 Paul [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-09-08  6:49 Why? dhog
1995-09-07 22:27 Why? mkc
1995-09-07 16:48 Why? Steve_Kilbane
1995-09-07 16:22 Why? Gary
1995-09-07 16:12 Why? Borja
1995-09-07 15:44 Why? presotto
1995-09-07 11:14 Why? Borja
1995-09-07  8:35 Why? Paul
1995-09-07  5:50 Why? Andrew
1995-09-07  5:12 Why? Gary
1995-09-06 20:24 Why? Borja
1995-09-06 19:21 Why? Steve_Kilbane
1995-09-06 18:11 Why? Dave
1995-09-06 17:29 Why? Dave
1995-09-04 15:14 Why? presotto
1995-09-03 18:23 Why? presotto
1995-09-03 18:17 Why? Andrew
1995-09-03  5:28 Why? Curt
1995-09-03  5:26 Why? Curt
1995-09-02  1:17 Why? Will
1995-09-01 18:52 Why? Mike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19950906195231.Q-VxuoCSCqItrJ4qA6Mj3OSWKYBCUL7lw_1ZffFin8U@z \
    --to=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).