From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 8 Sep 1995 05:15:01 -0400 From: Martin Weitzel Martin.Weitzel@rent-a-guru.de Subject: licensing terms (was: Re: Why?) Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2236cf98-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Message-ID: <19950908091501.-puv9no98Rn_VUMBU2m-spVhs6ZZoTnYXLaWD94nqzw@z> Before I jump into that discussion I want to say that I'm quite happy with the current price. Well, I own my "one-man-company", for a student the price might be a bit steep, but it's still only a fraction of what the required hardware costs, as somebody else already mentioned, and YOU GET THE SOURCE, OF COURSE. > There is no fixed price for a commercial license (i.e. > a license which lets the buyer resell products or services > based on the released software). Where exactly is the borderline between "commercial" and "non-commercial" use, e.g. if I own a "non-commercial" license, is it OK to - use the text processing software of Plan 9 to PRODUCE a book or any other piece of writing I later SELL to others? - being paid for writing a book ABOUT Plan 9 (not necessarily USING Plan 9 for the process of writing). Further, given that there is another person or company who ALSO has a valid "non-commercial" license (bought independently from mine), would it be OK - being paid by the OTHER person/company for developing software using their system. - being paid for teaching the other person how to use the system and about its inner workings (i.e. SELLING knowledge I acquired by means of MY OWN system)? - develop software on MY OWN system and later SELL it to someone else with a valid "non-commercial" license? > Of course companies can use Plan 9 internally on as many > computers as they like for $350 total. In fact, that's what I like so much about Plan 9's licensing terms! In contrast: According to the licensing terms of my ISC-Unix I am allowed to have "at most two copies" of the system. If I count the installation set as "one", the active installation on my hard disk as "two", I'm going to break the license whenever I backup on tape ... --Martin