From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 10:08:09 -0400
From: jmk@plan9.att.com jmk@plan9.att.com
Subject: differences between cdrom and pcdist
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 278d4756-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025
Message-ID: <19950926140809.wtoF4TQ2ia0sinARjStgRoylwRiu0ilS_6-RCgypz-E@z>

not all changes have make it out, the important ones have.
the pcdist binaries come from the running system.

there are no systems using the 29000, there was interest at one time
in writing some code for an embedded product.

------ original message follows ------

>>From cse.psu.edu!9fans-outgoing-owner Tue Sep 26 00:42:37 EDT 1995
Received: by colossus.cse.psu.edu id <78453>; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:26:47 -0400
Received: from cannon.ecf.toronto.edu ([128.100.8.5]) by colossus.cse.psu.edu with SMTP id <78446>; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:26:31 -0400
Received: by cannon.ecf.toronto.edu id <1013>; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:26:21 -0400
From:	Steve Kotsopoulos <steve@ecf.toronto.edu>
To:	9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: differences between cdrom and pcdist
Message-Id: <95Sep26.002621edt.1013@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
Date:	Tue, 26 Sep 1995 00:26:21 -0400
Sender: owner-9fans@cse.psu.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu

I noticed that /386/bin/ar /386/bin/ftpfs and /386/bin/sed are different
between the cdrom and pcdist, but couldn't find any mention of bug fixes
or other changes in the errata or updates area. Are there source patches?

Also, /sys/include/a.out.h and /sys/include/mach.h include definitions
for an AMD 29000 platform. Which systems use that processor?