* Suitability for Real Time Control?
@ 1995-10-27 0:55 Bob
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bob @ 1995-10-27 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
Right now we are using OS9 on a 68302 and some 68000s for
real time machine controls (Think of a toy radio controlled bulldozer,
but weighs in at about 50 english tons).
We are looking at what to use in our next generation systems.
How suitable is Plan9 to real time machine controls?
As I understand it now Plan9 will work on 68020's, what will it
take to port it to 68K or Cold Fire?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Suitability for Real Time Control?
@ 1995-10-27 16:15 philw
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: philw @ 1995-10-27 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
not suitable. its a general purpose system.
there is no interrupt priority scheme, no
real scheduler.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1995-10-27 16:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1995-10-27 0:55 Suitability for Real Time Control? Bob
1995-10-27 16:15 philw
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).