9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jim mckie jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com
Subject: Plan 9 for dual Pentium machine...
Date: Sun,  7 Apr 1996 23:42:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19960408034225.uKpZSUIOiT3JCSahb0MzQLqfNQAXyTB2FCw06nLN8X4@z> (raw)

In porting Brazil to a dual Pentium system I basically threw away all the PC
device drivers and started from scratch as I was unsure how many of them were
MP-safe (I know I wrote some which weren't). I've been writing drivers on an
as-needed basis and currently the only drivers are for Buslogic SCSI controllers,
the AMD79C970 ethernet controller, the 3COM EtherLinkIII and Fast Etherlink
controllers and the UARTs; these drivers bear little resemblance to those distributed.
Note there is no VGA (or mouse) driver, not necessary for a CPU server.
Much of the initialisation, memory management and interrupt handling code was
completely rewritten too, some of it had to be but some of it just needed going
over again, it had been a long time.

The code could be back-ported to Plan 9 but there's no incentive here to do so.
However, I intend to fix-up the fileserver kernel sometime to incorporate all the
fixes found since the distribution was cut and that may be a good candidate for
back-porting the MP code to.

Regarding hardware, I've used an ASUS PCI/E-P54NP4D, a Gigabyte GA-586ID and a Tyan
Tempest S1462 (there are details on these boards in the FAQ). If you can wait there
will be a new generation of boards shipping in the next few weeks based on the
Triton-II chipset which promises much better memory and I/O bandwidth than those
above which are all based on the older but more stable Neptune chipset. The older
boards are probably listed above in order of decreasing preference.

--jim

------ forwarded message follows ------

>From cse.psu.edu!9fans-outgoing-owner Sat Apr  6 04:44:18 EST 1996
Received: from colossus.cse.psu.edu by plan9; Sat Apr  6 04:44:18 EST 1996
Received: by colossus.cse.psu.edu id <78657>; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 04:31:57 -0500
Received: from skat.usc.edu ([128.125.253.131]) by colossus.cse.psu.edu with SMTP id <78596>; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 04:31:41 -0500
Received: (from taweil@localhost)
	by skat.usc.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3/usc)
	id BAA25317; Sat, 6 Apr 1996 01:31:28 -0800 (PST)
Date:	Sat, 6 Apr 1996 04:31:28 -0500
Message-Id: <199604060931.BAA25317@skat.usc.edu>
From:	Ta-Wei Li <skat.usc.edu!taweil>
To:	9fans <cse.psu.edu!9fans>
Subject: Plan 9 for dual Pentium machine...
Sender: cse.psu.edu!owner-9fans
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cse.psu.edu!9fans

Hi,

  A while ago I asked a question about the availablility of Plan 9 for
dual Pentium system and I got a reply saying that a dual Pentium has
been done for Brazil but there was no plan for such port of Plan
9. I'd like to know if this is still true. I am planning on getting a
new machine to set up a CPU server and if Plan 9 is available for dual
Pentium machine, I'd like to know which motherboard it supports.

Thanks.

-- 
Ta-Wei Li







             reply	other threads:[~1996-04-08  3:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1996-04-08  3:42 jim [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-04-12  0:48 John
1996-04-10 21:59 Julian
1996-04-09 12:46 td
1996-04-09 12:44 dhog
1996-04-09 12:00 Julian
1996-04-08 18:53 Dave
1996-04-08 16:57 de5
1996-04-06  9:31 Ta-Wei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19960408034225.uKpZSUIOiT3JCSahb0MzQLqfNQAXyTB2FCw06nLN8X4@z \
    --to=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).