From: forsyth@plan9.cs.york.ac.uk forsyth@plan9.cs.york.ac.uk
Subject: none
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 1996 02:36:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19961202023612.BgoIAn3KNZaLRzKmzgYSuq5v3yQ7gcJ8qtZDnsn4WDs@z> (raw)
i'm afraid i'd prefer to die first, so i'm unlikely to implement it.
pop3 is `yet another protocol that would not be needed if people used a (any)
reasonable file service protocol', but at least it's small.
imap is ludicrous. #C/cmd points to a simpler yet more general approach.
imap is a good example of `every protocol its own, disjoint operating system'.
------ original message follows ------
>From cse.psu.edu!owner-9fans Sun Dec 1 21:19:28 GMT 1996
Received: from localhost (majordom@localhost) by cse.psu.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA16129; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:58:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: by claven.cse.psu.edu (bulk_mailer v1.5); Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:57:58 -0500
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by cse.psu.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA16111 for 9fans-outgoing; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:57:51 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: claven.cse.psu.edu: majordom set sender to owner-9fans using -f
Received: from mako.northsea.com (qmailr@mako.northsea.com [206.65.69.92]) by cse.psu.edu (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA16107 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Sun, 1 Dec 1996 15:57:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 20187 invoked by uid 100); 1 Dec 1996 20:56:20 -0000
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: none
References: <199612011659.LAA14808@cse.psu.edu>
Organization: North Sea, Ltd.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 5B 75 89 9C 86 E9 99 4F AB 26 91 F8 55 C9 F7 1E
Comments: Hyperbole mail buttons accepted, v4.01
From: Stan Norton <norton@northsea.com>
Date: 01 Dec 1996 15:56:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: forsyth@plan9.cs.york.ac.uk's message of Sun, 1 Dec 1996 17:04:21 GMT
Message-ID: <x77mn2htl7.fsf@mako.northsea.com>
Lines: 8
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.25/XEmacs 19.14
Sender: owner-9fans@cse.psu.edu
Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Precedence: bulk
forsyth@plan9.cs.york.ac.uk writes:
>
> i've got a pop3 implementation i can (will) give him.
> it's smaller than the bsd one, but still too much for such
> a simple protocol.
has imap been implemented?
next reply other threads:[~1996-12-02 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-12-02 2:36 forsyth [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-12-03 0:49 none Scott
1996-12-02 13:03 none forsyth
1996-12-02 3:25 none Scott
1996-12-01 20:56 none Stan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19961202023612.BgoIAn3KNZaLRzKmzgYSuq5v3yQ7gcJ8qtZDnsn4WDs@z \
--to=forsyth@plan9.cs.york.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).