From: Steve_Kilbane@cegelecproj.co.uk Steve_Kilbane@cegelecproj.co.uk
Subject: porting linux programs and drivers to plan9
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 08:52:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19970418075259.y6USXnnQ9G0i1Qo7CaTmvGz9J9PxtfAKaPEWurzaz_A@z> (raw)
> I'm an undergrad, need I say more?
Just a wild guess, but I'd say that there are probably more
academic organisations using Plan 9 than commercial ones (excluding
individuals who have their own copies). So, you should consider
extolling its virtues to your admin staff. Point out that forsyth's
FTP/Web server is running on a diskless Sun 3/60, and it wasn't too
long ago that his desktop machine was a 386 with - what? - 4MB? 8MB?
So, if they've got any old h/w kicking around that doesn't have the
energy for Linux or NT (manic laugh), Plan 9 may suit them.
> For others who don't have endless computers kicking around, if the
> pcdist had a free pppclient,
Plausible, but then, this is a demonstration system. I have to admit
that the easy of networking is one of the cooler aspects of Plan 9,
so a standalone demo seems a little strange. But what would you leave
out?
> a large documentation library,
Cough. Again, what would you leave out?
> and a
> commonly recognized editor (can we agree on microemacs?)
Uh, no. "commonly recognized" is a subjective term, and in this
particular context, so's "editor". Sam is as much a part of the
demonstration as everything else.
> plan 9 would
> not be as much of a shock to new users.
Some things do come as a shock; it's like a light being turned on.
"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is
not worth knowing."
> My interpretation of the license says that as long as I'm a "member" of
> an organization, meaning that I'm working towards the goals of that
> organization no matter my political or geographical position, I am
> included in the license agreement.
"working towards the goals of that organization" is a pretty dodgy
definition of "member". Recycling glass bottles doesn't make me a
member of Greenpeace.
If you're employed by a company that's got a licence, you can use
it. If you're a student at a university that's got a licence, you
can use it. Just sharing a common interest in Plan 9 doesn't
cover it.
The licence terms are extremely generous - enough so that it
seems ungrateful to stretch them too far through sophistry.
steve
next reply other threads:[~1997-04-18 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-04-18 7:52 Steve_Kilbane [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-04-21 20:59 miller
1997-04-21 16:27 Eric
1997-04-21 14:53 Milon
1997-04-21 12:50 miller
1997-04-21 11:29 Nigel
1997-04-21 8:05 Boyd
1997-04-21 7:16 chad
1997-04-21 3:36 presotto
1997-04-21 1:03 David
1997-04-20 16:12 miller
1997-04-19 16:49 Magnus
1997-04-19 10:22 Digby
1997-04-19 4:59 chad
1997-04-19 4:09 ozan
1997-04-19 3:52 Berry
1997-04-19 1:51 David
1997-04-19 0:56 Rich
1997-04-19 0:41 Rich
1997-04-18 21:19 Paul
1997-04-18 21:01 Digby
1997-04-18 20:47 Digby
1997-04-18 16:39 presotto
1997-04-18 16:10 Eric
1997-04-18 16:07 Eric
1997-04-18 15:57 Eric
1997-04-18 15:51 Eric
1997-04-18 15:37 Dean
1997-04-18 15:14 forsyth
1997-04-18 13:54 Brandon
1997-04-18 9:50 Andrew
1997-04-18 8:10 Digby
1997-04-18 8:04 Digby
1997-04-18 7:58 Steve_Kilbane
1997-04-18 7:15 Nigel
1997-04-18 5:57 Nickolay
1997-04-18 5:49 Brandon
1997-04-18 4:59 jmk
1997-04-18 3:15 Steve
1997-04-18 0:33 Pete
1997-04-17 23:43 Eric
1997-04-17 23:19 Eric
1997-04-17 21:55 Eric
1997-04-17 21:46 Rich
1997-04-17 21:45 Rich
1997-04-17 18:43 Eric
1997-04-17 18:17 forsyth
1997-04-17 18:13 forsyth
1997-04-17 17:59 Bodet
1997-04-17 17:07 Pete
1997-04-17 16:33 Rich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19970418075259.y6USXnnQ9G0i1Qo7CaTmvGz9J9PxtfAKaPEWurzaz_A@z \
--to=steve_kilbane@cegelecproj.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).