From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 1997 15:37:19 +0000
From: Dean Jansa Jr jansad@hickory410.cray.com
Subject: porting linux programs and drivers to plan9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 57cc12f8-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025
Message-ID: <19970418153719.shvMyoIYTneQLbBkvOihs3wZxFGSB8Yaa4xi3W5YjFk@z>

In article <33569A1A.60B3F331@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> cannings@cpsc.ucalgary.CA (Rich Cannings) writes:

   I see many people share your views on unix software. Without digressing
   into a unix vs. plan9 spam match, if sam is to plan9 as ed is to unix
   then what would be  the emacs of plan9? (I'm sorry Mr. Pike but I can't
   believe anyone could write code in sam as fast as in emacs.)

sam is to ed 
as
acme is to emacs

Actually I think acme (and wily its Unix clone) is faster than emacs.

-Dean