From: Milon Papezik papezik@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz
Subject: porting linux programs and drivers to plan9
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 16:53:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19970421145308.IXO5zUoromGfPafwPZPxcnd0FYOG4GerCJJHWWb0zZA@z> (raw)
> presotto@plan9.bell-labs.com writes:
>
> > [a fascinating account of how the Pentium Pro's out-of-order
> > instruction execution breaks the Plan 9 sleep/wakeup code on
> > a multi-CPU system]
>
> It appears that the slightly different version of sleep/wakeup
> given in the Volume 2 paper `Process Sleep and Wakeup on a
> Shared-memory Multiprocessor' should be immune to the effects
> of weak memory coherency, because the shared variables are
> referenced only inside a lock/unlock pair. Is this right?
Which paper do you mean? Any pointers would be appreciated...
Thanks in advance!
Milon
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Milon Papezik, Technical University of Brno, Dept. of Computer Science
next reply other threads:[~1997-04-21 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-04-21 14:53 Milon [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-04-21 20:59 miller
1997-04-21 16:27 Eric
1997-04-21 12:50 miller
1997-04-21 11:29 Nigel
1997-04-21 8:05 Boyd
1997-04-21 7:16 chad
1997-04-21 3:36 presotto
1997-04-21 1:03 David
1997-04-20 16:12 miller
1997-04-19 16:49 Magnus
1997-04-19 10:22 Digby
1997-04-19 4:59 chad
1997-04-19 4:09 ozan
1997-04-19 3:52 Berry
1997-04-19 1:51 David
1997-04-19 0:56 Rich
1997-04-19 0:41 Rich
1997-04-18 21:19 Paul
1997-04-18 21:01 Digby
1997-04-18 20:47 Digby
1997-04-18 16:39 presotto
1997-04-18 16:10 Eric
1997-04-18 16:07 Eric
1997-04-18 15:57 Eric
1997-04-18 15:51 Eric
1997-04-18 15:37 Dean
1997-04-18 15:14 forsyth
1997-04-18 13:54 Brandon
1997-04-18 9:50 Andrew
1997-04-18 8:10 Digby
1997-04-18 8:04 Digby
1997-04-18 7:58 Steve_Kilbane
1997-04-18 7:52 Steve_Kilbane
1997-04-18 7:15 Nigel
1997-04-18 5:57 Nickolay
1997-04-18 5:49 Brandon
1997-04-18 4:59 jmk
1997-04-18 3:15 Steve
1997-04-18 0:33 Pete
1997-04-17 23:43 Eric
1997-04-17 23:19 Eric
1997-04-17 21:55 Eric
1997-04-17 21:46 Rich
1997-04-17 21:45 Rich
1997-04-17 18:43 Eric
1997-04-17 18:17 forsyth
1997-04-17 18:13 forsyth
1997-04-17 17:59 Bodet
1997-04-17 17:07 Pete
1997-04-17 16:33 Rich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19970421145308.IXO5zUoromGfPafwPZPxcnd0FYOG4GerCJJHWWb0zZA@z \
--to=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).