9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Bochannek abochann@cisco.com
Subject: The future of Plan9?
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 16:28:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19970429232828.jPUwzhZiNJa2Hh8AC7DyDHvuWTOtvObq1WrBBvzL_YM@z> (raw)

As a long-time friend of Plan9 and someone who purchased the Plan9
license back in '95, I found all this discussion from a couple of
weeks ago very interesting.

I personally have been very intrigued by Plan9 ever since I first
heard about it and was hoping to be able to spend some time with the
system but never really had the chance to do so.

All this talk about "What's happening with Plan9?" and "How about
Brazil?" left me wondering what the community really is hoping to get
out of these developments. From Bell Labs' eh, I mean Lucent's
perspective, things are pretty clear. Their primary focus right now is
a commercially viable system that will bring in some revenue. Plan9 is
not it and Brazil won't be it either. That's were Inferno comes in and
anybody who hangs out at the Inferno mailing-list knows, most
discussion there has been about commercial aspects of the system
lately.

So, the question is: Where to from here? It appears to me that the
people who do stuff with Plan9 (mostly academic and hobbyists) can't
really get a grip on what it is they want out of it. Is it a learning
system? A home system? A commercial system? Whatever it is, it
attracts people from different parts of the World with different
interests. People who, for some reason, don't feel like tinkering
around with *BSD, Linux or commercial OS's.

OK, now, let's have some discussion here as to where you want to go
with Plan9 (reference to Microsoft commercial unintentional ;-)
Personally, I am hoping that there are people out there who are seeing
a real opportunity in Plan9 as a great way for hobbyists to get
involved again in what used to be dominated by them and is now
completely industialized. What I am referring to are the early days of
the microcomputer revolution where people had a real sense of communal
belonging and it was the hobbyist who pushed the technological
envelope.

Before I start going off on some weird techno-sociological tangent, I
think I should stop here and open the floor for discussion.

Absolutely not speaking for my employer....

> > I, too, am curious about the disposition of Brazil.  I actually got
> > some funding approved for Plan 9 here at MIT (I'm part of a student
> > ...
> > Is there an `official' answer?  Is there an unofficial answer from
> > someone who has put more effort than I am into trying to get an
> > official answer?
>  
> here's an unofficial answer.
>  
> we've been working on other things for the past year or so,
> so there has been little new work on brazil.  phil and rob
> and dave say that they want to get back to working on
> brazil, but we don't know when that will be.
> 
> our plan 9 system is only used to access the old worm for archival
> purposes.  our new file server contains only the brazil source
> tree, so brazil is our current development system.  brazil is not
> in a state that is releasable, so i doubt that there will be
> a brazil release in the foreseeable future.
> 
> of course, all of this could change in a wink.

--
Alex Bochannek                 Phone & Fax : +1 408 526 51 91
Senior Network Analyst         Pager       : +1 408 485 90 92
Engineering Computing Services Alpha Pager : (800) 225-0256 PIN 104536
Cisco Systems, Inc.            Email       : abochannek@cisco.com
170 West Tasman Drive, Bldg. E Pager Email : abochannek@beeper.cisco.com
San Jose, CA 95134-1706, USA




             reply	other threads:[~1997-04-29 23:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-04-29 23:28 Alex [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-05-08  4:39 Adam
1997-05-06  0:45 Eric
1997-05-05 14:02 Brandon
1997-05-04  9:04 Markus
1997-05-02 22:04 Bengt
1997-05-02 12:26 Digby
1997-05-02  0:59 Digby
1997-05-01 19:14 Greg
1997-05-01 18:28 Eric
1997-05-01 16:04 Berry
1997-05-01 15:25 Tom
1997-05-01 12:46 bwong
1997-05-01  7:45 Steve_Kilbane
1997-05-01  3:54 Digby
1997-04-30 23:48 Scott
1997-04-30 21:11 rsc
1997-04-30 20:09 Lucio
1997-04-30 17:06 Digby
1997-04-30  7:38 Borja
1997-04-30  6:01 Brandon
1997-04-29 23:06 Digby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19970429232828.jPUwzhZiNJa2Hh8AC7DyDHvuWTOtvObq1WrBBvzL_YM@z \
    --to=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).