9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brandon Black photon@nol.net
Subject: The future of Plan9?
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 01:01:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19970430060127.1ynYdJNFYzQIl1nvUNHV3dXaS8BvfwRVY5LLgeV6pTI@z> (raw)


<just pretend I quoted the whole thing>

I have an almost clear definition in my mind of what _I_ wish would come
of Plan 9/Brazil.  Unix is entrenched in the business world, and Unix will
probably not go away for a very long time.  I am a unix person, so please
don't take my bashing wrong.....  Unix has fallen over the years... most
of the commercial vendors (Sun, SGI, IBM, DEC, ....) have concentrated on
GUI's, Systems Admin tools, and hardware speedups in recent versions.  The
commercial unix world has very miserably failed to put forth new operating
system concepts, like those introduced by Plan 9.  Now, Brazil would never
get any market share as a *nix replacement, because it is not compatible
enough or supported enough (I can see commercial buyers saying: Where's
C++?  Where's the normal *nix include files?  There's no Sybase or Oracle
server for this? etc.....).... 

However, The concepts learned from Brazil could be deployed into current
*nix systems.  Lucent could license out the Brazil source code for
incorporation into the commercial *nix's.... or could incorporate it into
Reasearch Unix... or add some plan9-ish-ness to the successor of the
SysVR4 definition..... or some combination thereof...

I can only imagine what it would feel like to bind namespaces under
Solaris, or to use remote CPU resources to compile software without
leaving my local environment on an SGI.... 

my $.02

Brandon





             reply	other threads:[~1997-04-30  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-04-30  6:01 Brandon [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-05-08  4:39 Adam
1997-05-06  0:45 Eric
1997-05-05 14:02 Brandon
1997-05-04  9:04 Markus
1997-05-02 22:04 Bengt
1997-05-02 12:26 Digby
1997-05-02  0:59 Digby
1997-05-01 19:14 Greg
1997-05-01 18:28 Eric
1997-05-01 16:04 Berry
1997-05-01 15:25 Tom
1997-05-01 12:46 bwong
1997-05-01  7:45 Steve_Kilbane
1997-05-01  3:54 Digby
1997-04-30 23:48 Scott
1997-04-30 21:11 rsc
1997-04-30 20:09 Lucio
1997-04-30 17:06 Digby
1997-04-30  7:38 Borja
1997-04-29 23:28 Alex
1997-04-29 23:06 Digby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19970430060127.1ynYdJNFYzQIl1nvUNHV3dXaS8BvfwRVY5LLgeV6pTI@z \
    --to=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).