From: Boyd Roberts boyd@france3.fr
Subject: time(2)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 11:47:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19970430094751.1IlUNex8qFFqciJrT9QpVmk7GaRGYsFxtT_W5_1yr4Y@z> (raw)
how come it returns a long? is it because it wasn't a big issue that
plan 9 should still work in 2038 or was it the attitude of 'we'll
change it if we need it' or something else?
reply other threads:[~1997-04-30 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19970430094751.1IlUNex8qFFqciJrT9QpVmk7GaRGYsFxtT_W5_1yr4Y@z \
--to=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).