From: G. David Butler gdb@dbSystems.com
Subject: [9fans] Adding transaction semantics to Plan9
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 16:12:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19970902201227.WxNc9w5SEihqqgnpGIVHH4AO9_OnqArRCuEk7mj2BeY@z> (raw)
Hello everyone. I have been quiet for a while, but that is just
the quiet before the storm. I have some new things I want to
discuss!
My current project is to add transaction support to the process
model with full log protected file servers. I plan to use the
multi-version consistency model and distributed commits to multiple
file servers involved in the transaction.
The primitives are from a Bell Labs paper "A Flexible Transaction
Facility for an Object-Oriented Database" from 5 Dec 92. (To keep
it in the family.) The system is will not be object-oriented
(unless you want to consider a "file" or a "directory" a class).
The primitives are useful for implementing transaction models that
are interesting.
The changes are extensive. The file protocal 9P is changed (to add
the idea of a transaction to the current idea of a user.) Several
system calls are changed and a few added to internalize the idea of
a transaction. I am just starting.
I am planing three transaction modes. Read Committed, Serializable
and Plan9. The latter is Read Committed and Write Commit.
The primitives allow "cursor stability", savepoint/rollback,
nested and chained transactions, to name a few.
The plan for the system is to build low cost data intensive
application servers for the Internet. I belive that transactional
semantics are required in any large scale distributed system and
current systems are cost prohibitive. In addition, the current
state of the art is to run a database on top of an operating system.
I believe there is a lot of efficiences to be gained by making
them one.
Just pick an issue and let's get going...
David Butler
gdb@dbSystems.com
next reply other threads:[~1997-09-02 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-09-02 20:12 G.David [this message]
1997-09-04 14:40 G.David
1997-09-04 21:32 G.David
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19970902201227.WxNc9w5SEihqqgnpGIVHH4AO9_OnqArRCuEk7mj2BeY@z \
--to=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).