From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 12:38:56 -0800 From: Eric Dorman eld@jewel.ucsd.edu Subject: [9fans] DPT PM2041W observations Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6fd3a3c0-eac8-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Message-ID: <19980112203856.YMmLmyUHBJfpTZ9BZ6YLzbbYaSgux8XvR34b2iOsp4A@z> > Date: Mon, 12 Jan 1998 13:58:43 -0600 > From: "G. David Butler" > To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu > Subject: Re: [9fans] DPT PM2041W observations > > >If the answer to that is "yes, with Tag Queueing", then I > >need some kind soul to help me get that to happen on the > >DPT adapter. (The 154x can't do that.) None of the > >documentation or source I have enable that feature. > > I found and read the relevant parts of the SCSI-2 spec. > I now have tag queueing working. I also found the DPO flag > which helps both cards. Now the 154x does 1460MB/s (2% isn't > much, but anything helps.) Cool. Patch? > So why does this 4th generation card with tag queueing support > run slower than the 1st generation design that is over 10 years > old? Perhaps the driver for the 1540 is better optimized as it's been around longer, and it's had more work put into it. There might be something in the DPT documentation that one can do with the card that one can't do with a 1540 ( bus on/off? ). 1540 is a well-developed and understood card, whereas most other stuff isin't nearly as common. > David Butler > gdb@dbSystems.com Regards, Eric Dorman edorman@ucsd.edu