9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: G. David Butler gdb@dbSystems.com
Subject: [9fans] create(2)/open(2) race for file creation
Date: Sun,  8 Feb 1998 09:48:34 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19980208154834.KcDL7tQ5cqcNP20UwhP5L6C5_BxyfOuf19jlYLtoFGQ@z> (raw)

>From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk
>>>Any comments?
>
>it's hopeless trying to offer advice without knowing
>what you're actually trying to achieve at the application level
>(except that i can already say i really don't approve of the proposed
>change to create).
>
>what's the aim?

I have data coming from many sources that have a unique key
associated with it.  I want to be able to receive this data
using the key as a file name without the data being corrupted.
This data may need to be updated at times.  I have serveral
processes receiving this data and I don't want the data if I
already have it because my copy may have already been updated.

If I use the algorithm:

if stat fails {
	create
	write
	close
}

I have no guarantee about the amout of time between the stat
and the create for each process.  What I need is a atomic test
and set on each possible name.  create(5) give me that, but there
is no way to get to it from the available system calls.  I can't
use rendezvous because the processes are on different cpu servers.

So if you don't want to change create(2), do we implement O_EXCL?

David Butler
gdb@dbsystems.com




             reply	other threads:[~1998-02-08 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-02-08 15:48 G.David [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-02-26 23:30 Russ
1998-02-26 23:01 G.David
1998-02-26 22:16 G.David
1998-02-26 19:33 Eric
1998-02-26  0:24 G.David
1998-02-26  0:04 G.David
1998-02-25 23:42 G.David
1998-02-10 14:34 G.David
1998-02-10  8:59 forsyth
1998-02-09 21:21 G.David
1998-02-09 16:42 G.David
1998-02-09  8:05 Dan
1998-02-08 22:48 G.David
1998-02-08 22:18 Photon
1998-02-08 21:44 Rob
1998-02-08 21:10 G.David
1998-02-08 16:52 G.David
1998-02-08 16:16 G.David
1998-02-08 16:10 Dave
1998-02-08  5:09 G.David
1998-02-08  2:01 Rob
1998-02-08  0:27 G.David

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19980208154834.KcDL7tQ5cqcNP20UwhP5L6C5_BxyfOuf19jlYLtoFGQ@z \
    --to=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).