9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com
Subject: [9fans] using mouse (was: ... using sam)
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 1998 20:29:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19980824002921.HeHLxJsAwwX1IAyFtRZMrdfPS0MfFqD61-AL2otq1C0@z> (raw)

If you're using a `battleship' pc keyboard or a laptop built-in mouse
(or worse, trackball or `glide pad', the instant cause of
carpal-tunnel syndrome), I can see why you're unhappy.  In my
department, we've been trying various small keyboards and mice, with
and without wires.  We plug real mice into laptops.

keyboard(6) does say
          Caps Lock acts as an additional control key.
but some people miss that; it means that the control key is in the
same place on all keyboards: to the left of the `a' key.

We used to buy the Lexmark `model m4' wired keyboards, which are small
and don't have much unused surface area.  ~ ` is above ESC.  Their main
drawbacks are that they are somewhat loud and have been discontinued
by Lexmark, though you could ask unicomp@lex.infi.net if they have any
left (we bought 20 of their last 50).

We looked for successors to the Lexmark and tried the Behavioural
Technologies BTC-5100 wired keyboard.  It is smaller still but key
placement is just too unorthodox for most of the people who tried it.
I don't have one in front of me, so I can't describe the layout, but I
do recall swearing at it when I used it.  Trying to find the F1, F2 or
DEL key at boot time within a few seconds to get you into the bios
setup screen can be a real challenge.

We recently ordered wired and wireless keyboards from Sejin Electron
(www.sejin.com).  Apparently the standard footprint of wireless
keyboards is quite small; I don't understand why keyboard makers think
that people would want a keyboard the size of a piano's just because
it has a wire running all the way to your PS2 keyboard port.  Sejin's
wired and wireless keyboards all seem to be pretty small; we ordered
the spr-8630 wired keyboard at $42.00 and the spr-8695w wireless
keyboard at $90.00.  These two keyboards are similar, with or without
wire; the wireless ones are black and the wired are white.  (Sejin
does make battleship wired keyboards; beware.)  Drawbacks include
too-small ESC, tab and control or caps-lock keys; and unusual
placement of | \ ` ~ keys (it's a shame that ANSI didn't standardise
ASCII keyboard layout before PCs existed).  I only swear at it when I
reach for ` and hit ESC instead, thus taking me out of hold mode.

We are currently trying the PFU Happy Hacking wired keyboards (see
www.pfuca.com).  They are expensive, but their virtues include: no
caps lock key; extreme small size: only 5 rows of keys with no keys
right of Return, for a total of 60 keys; and cables to connect to PS2,
Mac or Sun keyboard ports.  | \ ~ ` are in the upper right corner, so
I tend to hit ESC by mistake on this one too.  There is an `Fn' shift
key that overloads various keys.  Fn and a digit generates the key
code for that function key (e.g.  `Fn 3' acts like an F3 key).  `Fn /'
generates the down-arrow key code, and that's a minor nuisance when
you want to scroll.  DEL and BS (backspace) are on the same key by
default; not having unshifted Delete and Backspace keys is the biggest
nuisance we've found yet.  Initially, the Delete key normally
generates DEL and with the Fn shift key generates a BS.  `Fn `' also
generates DEL.  There is one switch, it selects one of four modes; two
of them make the Delete key always generate a BS, and that may be
preferable.  We like the rest of the keyboard enough that we've been
coping by typing control-H for BS (an old habit some of us developed
because the Backspace key has moved all over the keyboard over the
years).


Logitech used to make the best 3-button mice, wired and wireless, that
I have used since DePraz (the red 5620 mice).  Their original wireless
mice didn't suffer from `cord drag' but seemed a little less precise
than their wired mice, which is particularly noticeable in acme.
Since Scott Adams rewrote their mission statement, they seem to have
gone bonkers (or are now designing mice for non-humans).  They now
make mice with narrow vestigial middle buttons, mice with wheels
embedded in the buttons, mice with four buttons, mice with buttons on
the *side*, mice with the buttons in the wrong order (2 1 3 instead of
1 2 3, or middle left right instead of left middle right), and mice
that combine these wretched misfeatures.  The number of the buttons
shall be three: no more, no less.  Judging from their web site, they
also now churn their product line like the rest of the PC hardware
vendors.  When I last looked a few weeks ago (and this may be
completely different now), they had no usable wireless mice.  Their
new wireless mice combine wrong order, side button and sometimes wheel
within vestigial middle button.  They do usually have one usable wired
mouse in their line up, but it keeps changing model name and number
and colour.  The Mouseman for Notebook is fine but it needs a PS2
extender cable.  The `First Mouse' looks like their original mice, but
under another name.  Beware of the so-called `Mountain Bike Mouse'
which has a fourth button on the side that gets in the way and acts
like a middle button; I think it has a wheel embedded in the fourth
button too.  It's easy to spot due to the wide purple stripes and nubs
on the side (hence the nickname).

If Logitech don't shape up, we may have to find another mouse vendor,
though there aren't many contenders.  It might be wise to stock up on
decent mice if you can still find them.




             reply	other threads:[~1998-08-24  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-08-24  0:29 geoff [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-08-27 23:04 Chris
1998-08-23 19:48 Digby
1998-08-23  5:16 Gary

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19980824002921.HeHLxJsAwwX1IAyFtRZMrdfPS0MfFqD61-AL2otq1C0@z \
    --to=geoff@plan9.bell-labs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).