9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rob@plan9.bell-labs.com rob@plan9.bell-labs.com
Subject: [9fans] Oil on the water
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 17:28:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <19980922212853.jIW-hz6Odo2X-0H_On08C910oMudDg3O4QuJ8DdQbMo@z> (raw)

We are considering doing a new distribution of Plan 9, the system we
have been calling Brazil internally to distinguish it from the
released system.  It's not promised or even decided yet, but given the
recent discussions in 9fans it seems worthwhile to explain what we're
thinking about.

A release would focus on the PC version, but would probably include at
least the sources necessary to get another architecture going.  This
reduction in scope is partly because we have fewer variant machines
around these days and partly to shrink the size of the work and of the
distribution itself.

The main obstacle to a release is pragmatic: the work of putting
together a coherent package of hundreds of programs and the better
part of a million lines of code is not something to be undertaken
lightly.  There were several man-years of documentation work alone in
the last distribution.  We don't relish going through all that again.
Also, there are inevitable difficulties with distributing a bootable
OS that do not arise when distributing a single application.  As you
all well know, these were a major source of trouble with the last
distribution.

If we sent out the system as it stands now, the major benefit would
probably be a more up-to-date set of supported hardware.  We would
like to offer more.  We have a number of sweeping changes at all
levels of the system that we're discussing and, in some cases, already
working on.  If we defer those to distribute the system now, what we
ship will soon be obsolete and you will be only marginally better off
than you are now.  If we wait to get all those cool things done that
make a distribution worthwhile for all concerned, you'll have to wait
quite a while.  Discussions continue on how and when to proceed.
Meanwhile, the system improves.

We are aware of the complications caused by the overlap between Plan 9
(Brazil), a research system, and Inferno, a commercial product.  The
overlap is easy to characterize and we believe the issue can be
resolved.  The real barriers to release are, as mentioned, the work
involved and the questions of what and when to release.

Any release is likely to be done over the web, on a `fee-free basis
for noncommercial use' (that is, no $350 price tag).  However, the
necessity for negotiations for commercial use will almost certainly
remain.  There will probably be no CD or other artifact, to keep costs
down and simplify publication of updates.  Please don't get too
particular about licensing details now; it's far too early and out of
our (CS Research's) hands, in any case.

-rob




             reply	other threads:[~1998-09-22 21:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-09-22 21:28 rob [this message]
1998-09-23  2:27 Digby
1998-09-23  4:48 Lucio
1998-09-23  5:40 G.David
1998-09-23  6:32 James
1998-09-23  8:37 steve_kilbane
1998-09-23 17:09 Frank
1998-09-24  3:04 jmk
1998-09-24  7:28 okamoto
1998-09-24  7:34 Elliott
1998-09-24  7:49 Nigel
1998-09-24  8:27 steve_kilbane
1998-09-24  8:54 Digby
1998-09-24  9:08 forsyth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=19980922212853.jIW-hz6Odo2X-0H_On08C910oMudDg3O4QuJ8DdQbMo@z \
    --to=rob@plan9.bell-labs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).