From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <9ef660d9df3d9ab8ea7faa657c2bdca8@quintile.net>
From: Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <9ef660d9df3d9ab8ea7faa657c2bdca8@quintile.net>
Message-Id: <1A2C2CAE-9935-4535-836F-F9CD5275E52D@9srv.net>
Date: Fri,  1 Mar 2013 12:38:02 -0500
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [9fans] Bug in print(2) g verb
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 222fe4a2-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mar 1, 2013, at 10:58, "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net> wrote:

> This relies on gcc running everywhere p9p runs...

s/gcc/sufficiently modern gcc/
I think that's the bigger issue. How far back in time is p9p looking to supp=
ort platforms from? I have at least one box in the basement with a much olde=
r gcc on it. In my particular case, nothing prevents me from upgrading (exce=
pt how painful dealing with gcc is), but I doubt that's true for everyone.

Relatedly, does anyone happen to know whether clang/llvm have these extensio=
ns as well?=