From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1a570e17207c62ffa52fda8519ef56ef@collyer.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] re: spam filtering fs From: Geoff Collyer In-Reply-To: <200309030059.h830xQj23628@augusta.math.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:50:34 -0700 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2ab00884-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 Knocking at the gate is one thing, crashing through with a bus full of aggressive salesmen in loud checks and plaids is another. A scheme that seems to be closer to what Ron wants would be to have the sending system contact the receiving system and announce that user so-and-so has a message of this size with this message-id that he wants to send to user thus-and-such on the receiving system; possibly there's some form of authentication that it really is so-and-so sending it. If thus-and-such's white-list permits it (presumably based on the sending user), the message is let through; if his black-list denies it, the message is refused, and if neither list mentions the sender, the sending system is told `we'll get back to you', the message is not accepted, and the receiving system appends a brief notification to thus-and-such's gray-list. Periodically, maybe once a day, thus-and-such scans his gray-list and if he sees a message that he wants to look at it, he fetches it by message-id from the sending system, incurring the band-width expenditure then. This could almost be cobbled together today using SMTP and POP3 or (god help us) IMAP4. The major change would be to have the sending system hang on to unsent (gray-listed) messages for some period so that they may be retrieved. I suppose that could almost be accomplished by having smtpd return the cabbalistic SMTP return code meaning `try again later'.