From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.6-329-gf4aae99-fmstable-20190329v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <1ab0f7e8-7028-40d3-a844-ad3f52cd1111@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1859706859.14691305.1554148175942@mail.yahoo.com>
References: <1859706859.14691305.1554148175942.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
	<1859706859.14691305.1554148175942@mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue,  2 Apr 2019 10:46:36 -0400
From: "Ethan Gardener" <eekee57@fastmail.fm>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: Re: [9fans] Are there disadvantages to walk?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f820f0fa-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 8:53 PM, Brian L. Stuart wrote:
>
> The only complaint I've had about walk was the expectation
> in the protocol that servers produce the list of Qids all
> the way down.  That got in the way when experimenting
> with a server that used a hash table of full path names
> to speed the walk process.

I can see how that would be a problem.  Thanks.