From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <1d238a8aeb5c897a9b90fa97c4a29065@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Fri,  4 Sep 2009 08:14:48 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <20090904071109.11C405B18@mail.bitblocks.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] "Blocks" in C
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 64070278-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> But this has no more to do with parallelism than any other
> feature of C. If you used __block vars in a block, you'd
> still need to lock them when the block is called from
> different threads.

that's a lot worse than a function pointer.  with
a function pointer your going to get unique space
on the stack for each invocation.

the variable capture thing seems to me to just
confuse the issue.  c doesn't otherwise work
like that.

- erik