From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1d5d51400603270118n7ac6441en71a34f893950f635@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:18:13 +0800 From: "Fernan Bolando" To: "9fans Mailing list" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] gnupg or pgp for plan9? In-Reply-To: <105ff5a0df2c594ec826765600ec7d49@quintile.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1d5d51400603262030g797394e0j4f3e142783bffe9a@mail.gmail.com> <105ff5a0df2c594ec826765600ec7d49@quintile.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2291d8b2-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On 3/27/06, Steve Simon wrote: > If you are just looking for file encryption then > auth/aescbc will do that for you. A little script > would allow you to validate a locally held md5sum > digest of the file to inform you of any tampering. > Aescbc is not portable outside of plan9 - p9p not > withstanding. > > -Steve > I am trying to get some sort of encyption. Protability between p9, linux an= d windows is a bit critical for my application ( I am paranoid ). I am currently considering blowfish because it's available on most machines= . Of course gnupg would be best. ,Fernan -- Public PGP/GnuPG key (http://www.fernski.com) pub 1024D/3576CA71 2006-02-02 Fernan Bolando Key fingerprint =3D FDFE C9A8 FFED C1A5 2F5C EFEB D595 AF1C 3576 CA71