9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fernan Bolando <fernanbolando@mailc.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9 for calculations
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 07:11:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d5d51400903271611q63646b09g2ff0b821ee898dc9@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a560a5d00903271431t7642f6dfk93dd656add811a8e@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I noticed there are some thoughts about using plan9 on supercomputers.
> For me supercomputers are usually used to do some heavy calculations.
> And this leads me to a question. What software is then used for
> programming these calculations? (I mean e.g. linear algebra, i.e.
> matrix, calculations.) Where can one read about that?
>
> More, it also leads me to a (perhaps) simpler question. What is the
> situations with ordinary machines?
>
> Untill now I have used several libraries in linux, all of them somehow
> based on lapack. I used C language (c-lapack), python (numpy), and now
> I do some programming in Fortran (Intel MKL). From my experience I
> would say: writing programs in C is a nightmare (for me next to no-go
> again), using python with numpy is a breeze, using Fortran (95) is
> sort of fine. C and Fortran run faster than python, but the factor,
> when I played with it, surprised me to be sth. like 3x (expecting a
> worse result).
>
> Now I've been thinking, If I were to write sth. in plan9, what would
> be the way to try?
> Recently I heard about eigen2 library, which seems to be nice (high
> performance, few dependencies), but for C++...
>
> Thank you for any suggestion
> Ruda
>
> PS.: It could be that plan9, being more a os-research system than
> anything else, is simply no suitable for such a use (there are no
> plotting libraries, other utilities). Perhaps it's not a good idea at
> all to try to use plan9 like that because it would be more work than
> anything. Maybe using linux for such things with all its tools is just
> ok. If you share this idea, just say it too, please.
>
>

Its not supercomputer level, but I have a sparse matrix solver in my
contrib. I use it along with haskell as simple replacement for octave.
It is mostly a collection of scripts right I am hoping to consolidate
it later as a single package. I also cannot give you a alot of example
mainly because it will translate to an actual project I did for my day
job although those were done on mathcad

I did notice that for some plotting needs simply piping it plot
command is adequate instead of bloating my tools with plot routines.

fernan

--
http://www.fernski.com



  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-27 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-27 21:31 Rudolf Sykora
2009-03-27 23:11 ` Fernan Bolando [this message]
2009-03-28  2:05 ` Roman V. Shaposhnik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1d5d51400903271611q63646b09g2ff0b821ee898dc9@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=fernanbolando@mailc.net \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).