From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <76be69f155cec68df27d6bc6bc2950ea@smgl.fr.eu.org> References: <166806220906220433ya10a40fy7ee67cfb78f28c5@mail.gmail.com> <76be69f155cec68df27d6bc6bc2950ea@smgl.fr.eu.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:40:07 +0800 Message-ID: <1d5d51400906220740w4058af66qfcf85b97fe67ccc@mail.gmail.com> From: Fernan Bolando To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p vac issue Topicbox-Message-UUID: 0da1b964-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Mathieu L. wrote: > if you can't get an old one from swtch.com, I can tar this mid-february > tree I have - or rather only the necessary parts - and serve it to you > if you want. > > Mathieu > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From:=A0Adrian Tritschler > To:=A0Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> > Date:=A0Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:33:22 +1000 > Subject:=A0Re: [9fans] p9p vac issue > 2009/6/22 Mathieu L. >> >> Indeed, this works for me as well. > > >> >> I've just migrated the arenas, bloom and isect to another machine with >> a p9p tree from mid February and I had no problem unvacing my data >> there. And for what it's worth, checkindex on that machine didn't report >> any problem while it did on the machine with the recent p9p install >> (which gives me the same vac/unvac issues as the ones already reported >> by a few people). > > OK, so all I need now is to get my hands on an old copy of the p9p binari= es... the only old ones I've got are carefully backed up inside the venti t= hat I can't get at :) > >> >> So the data seems to be ok, which is already quite a relief. >> Did you guys get this message when building the june 22 p9p? vac.c:509: warning: sizeof(pointer) possibly incorrect in argument 3 regards fernan --=20 http://www.fernski.com