From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20090922191954.837485B37@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <1d5d51400909221149u32faccd7ue23a538afa523a23@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090922191954.837485B37@mail.bitblocks.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:14:57 +0800
Message-ID: <1d5d51400909250114s2f547149ka58a049630a88097@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fernan Bolando <fernanbolando@mailc.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [9fans] zero length arrays in gcc
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 77549dcc-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Hi all

both option did not solve my lost pointer problem. I am still
verifying if it is due to something unrelated to zero length arrays

option1
 unsigned foo[1];
 #define startLabel (&foo[1])

option 2
static unsigned startLabel0;
static unsigned startLabel[] = &startLabel0

thanks
fernan

--
http://www.fernski.com