From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 21:33:23 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <1e4b0b8a588251202dbad8a4c9e02dbf@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <68ce90976b22bdb0929ccccafef4b7d0@kw.quanstro.net> <3330200.XJjoRb8JbZ@blitz> <5538fcd345a73fc294c6ee568f2fcdb4@kw.quanstro.net> <8ee568439e1855124564ecf0e83ac2b3@kw.quanstro.net> <6c7d84f203a2cc4f3427e177e34fa9d9@brasstown.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] rc's shortcomings (new subject line) Topicbox-Message-UUID: b546c18a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Thu Aug 30 10:56:52 EDT 2012, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote: > As another example, also from Flex, > J M Foster, I F Currie, "Remote Capabilities", The Computer Journal, 30(5), > 1987, pp. 451-7. > > http://comjnl.oxfordjournals.org/content/30/5/451.full.pdf very intersting. the paper says that although capabilities are enforced by microcode, and therefore can be proven, it would be possible to build the system from cots parts. so i'm wondering if kernel participation is necessary? - erik