From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1e7b2b8a93d679bbbe783e5bb0492ca6@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] permission bit of /mail/box From: okamoto@granite.cias.osakafu-u.ac.jp In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:49:32 +0900 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3fa8cd84-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 >> Actually, I smelled this kind of philosopy to my discussion that >> we should give an oppotunity not to make archive something. >> At least, the user should be able to choose it. > > but then you need a user interface to make the choice. not worth > it. just archive everything. I'm not a kernel person, however, I suppose we can do it without not so much efforts (Oh!, please don't ask myself to do it, because it's beyond my ability). When count a reference in fossil server, make a flag which indicates not to go archive, and those files/directories should not be archived. Those directoies should be confined only under /usr/$user directory. If a user doesn't set that flag, all goes to archive. On such a fossil, I can live with very comfortablly. Am I thinking wrong? Kenji