From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1ec471c29252ccf222c3e0ab1dbbc9ee@terzarima.net> From: Charles Forsyth Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 22:31:24 +0100 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Writing device drivers In-Reply-To: <775b8d190604161114jc2e5769gbd667c2e2e58ac8f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 37958e02-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >but, as i think charles was implying [about compiling c to >dis], you would get the "why doesn't X11 compile" etc. yes, and that even having got that to compile, there is now (even compared to 1996) a much bigger set of software that is expected to work. the relevance to `javascript' is that what the applications now require is a rather big set of software that is expected to work