From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 14:53:11 -0500 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <1ee0d370c013b1efefe0000738299d50@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20141106210544.GA20298@localhost> <20141107094425.GA29497@localhost> <20141107105708.cOSXGRv3%sdaoden@yandex.com> <20141107121929.GA10144@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] atexit() & atexitdont() Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2540f5ea-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri Nov 7 07:26:55 EST 2014, charles.forsyth@gmail.com wrote: > Not for atexit, but for some other functions, I've had to follow various > trails in glibc, > and it's just an intricate convoluted nightmare, so that probably colours > my view. calling malloc from the atexit path will pull malloc() into every executable. i think this is the real reason not to do this. - erik