From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <1fc0d9800807101249vbb497aew31c546846e6c3781@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:49:33 -0700 From: "Nick LaForge" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <93d4485aa014e231fed9238f2253a724@akira.nop.cx> <843b7f6b0807041600s5f0c8c20kdce8751586e40ebf@mail.gmail.com> <140e7ec30807071615n65208a7p9cfb57ecab2e5122@mail.gmail.com> <843b7f6b0807101202x1f39196kb332149539d35d58@mail.gmail.com> <071020081911.26180.48765EE2000270DB0000664422243651029B0A02D2089B9A019C04040A0DBF9B9D0E9A9B9C040D@att.net> Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3 Topicbox-Message-UUID: e2317446-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >>> Me again - Were you successfull in porting 9vx to OpenBSD? >>> If you need some testing help, contact me. >> >> Speaking of that, does anyone have an idea where NetBSD >> would fit into that? Of the bunch, that's the one I've >> used most and have deployed in the most places. I >> would think there would be some hope that an OpenBSD >> port would also work on NetBSD, but they forked long >> enough ago that threading could well be completely >> different. >> > > NetBSD is closer from OpenBSD than OpenBSD is from FreeBSD. so, you > may want to build and test my little changes. > > iru > > i'm interested in netbsd as a replacement for linux to serve 9p in small ARM machines... i could use this it seems netbsd-5 will be far different than the netbsd-4 that was released some time ago, this may be important